These may involve small files shared via emails or large ones which may exceed the email limit. To share such large files, you might have to compress them first. In this article, we will guide you on how you can compress multiple and large files. This is a file that has been reduced in size to occupy a relatively lower space in your computer drives or storage without interfering with its content.
It can be sent to any folder or drive in your computer or network and is compatible with other compression programs. However, the receiver can decompress the file to get its original version. You can use tools like the WinZip app to compress your zipped files on Android by following these simple steps:. Whereas it's possible to share files through DropBox, USB drive, or other means, it may be hard to keep them organized as you may prefer.
Tools like WinZip can help ensure none of your files are accidentally deleted or placed elsewhere by compressing them. It is crucial if you want users to download files from your website since no one is willing to download several small files. Check out the WinZip tool here. WinZip 26 NEW! Server Fault is a question and answer site for system and network administrators. It only takes a minute to sign up. Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.
What is the best way to backup millions of small files in a very small time period? We have less than 5 hours to backup a file system which contains around 60 million files which are mostly small files. We have tried several solutions such as richcopy, 7z, rsync and all of them seems to have a hard time. We are looking for the most optimal way We are open to putting the file in an archive first or transferring the file to another location via network or hard disk transfer.
I'd strongly suggest using a file storage system that allows you to snapshot the volume and backup from the snapshot. This way there's little impact on the actual server and the backup system can take its time doing the backup without concern for the main system. You don't mention an operating system but something like ZFS or a NetApp filer would allow this and both are being used for this exact function all over the place.
I'm sure there are other file systems that offer this but I know these work. They use raw disk image for backup. They also create a index file of names, md5 hash and date created via a script and use that to track the contents.
The original backup solution was to load the files as blobs in a database by the md5 signature. This was phased out since creating millions of md5 hashes took longer than just making a raw image backup. Do you really need to back up all of them every time? As you've looked at rsync , you could look at using rsnapshot , which creates a sort of incremental backup.
The bottlenecks here are going to be the file system and the HDD itself. With many small files, the FS is constantly reading metadata about the files which might be separate to the file, or the files that you are reading may not be in a nice contiguous clump on the disk. In either case, the drive head has to move around a lot. The faster you get all those small files into bigger files, the faster your overall process will be. Unfortunately, if all you are doing is copying those files once, then having them in a single large file like an archive will only make the process slower.
The optimal ways would be to either copy all the files once to a secondary location and then use the modified dates and sizes, or the archive bit, since you are using Windows, not content examination like hashes, that would still involve reading the files to determine which files have changed, and copy just those to the secondary location and backup from there.
Windows Server Backup in windows and later does volume-level images, so it doesn't ahve to troll through all the millions of pieces of file metadata. The progress is measured before compression and buffering, therefore it's not very accurate, but still helpful. This number can be reduced or increased depending on the network and CPU speed so zstd is a little bit faster than the the network speed. With four cores on a Haswell 3.
The T0 options sets the amount of threads to the number of cores. One should be aware that together with the long mode these settings use a lot of memory. This version is necessary for proper multi core and long support. Instead of zstd, one can also use xz or pigz. In the example a buffer is also used on the receiver side.
This is often unnecessary because decompression and hard disk writing speed is most time higher than the network speed , but does usually not harm, either. You can run tar on both ends using ssh.
This would be faster than first zipping it up, then sending, then unzipping, and it requires no extra disk space on either side. I sikpped the compression z flag on tar, because you probably dont have it on the ancient side.
Or you can do it the other way around if you need to. That is pull the tarball over the network rather than push it like has been suggested. This doesn't solve the repeating part of your question and rsync is best for that but there is probably tar switches to help. Best to be in the right directory first or you have to use the -C switch on the un tar ing command at the end.
Just mentioning this in case this is needed. It is for me as in my situation my local server is behind nat, so would take some network futzing about to be able to do it the way that's previously been mentioned. While not the most elegant, especially since it's not copying a single zip or tar file and doubly so as it doesn't help to reduce network ovehead, my only choice was to use scp -r :.
Note that scp follows symbolic links encountered in the tree traversal. Source: scp 1. I thought gunzip could do it inline, i. Then just grab some beer, coffee or popcorn and wait. Good thing is, scp will retry if the network connection "stalls". This worked for me like charm:.
For e. Copy folder and subfolders from sourceserver to targetserver , run this on sourceserver. In case you get permissions are too open for pem file, run this: chmod Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.
Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. How can I best copy large numbers of small files over scp?
0コメント